Termaine Joseph Hicks Wiki – Termaine Joseph Hicks Biography
An innocent Philadelphia man was released after serving 19 years because two policemen accidentally raped a woman and then shot her, even though she rescued her from another man.
Termaine Joseph Hicks’ lawyers claim that the police made up the story of shooting them and even placed a gun belonging to another officer in him.
Hicks, now 45 years old, was in St.Petersburg in South Philadelphia when he heard a woman scream in the early hours of November 27, 2001. Agnes Hospital.
Dunkin was walking an early shift in ‘Donuts’ when he was whipped with a gun and dragged into the alley by a man who raped her.
Hicks, who was working as Popeye’s deputy director at the time, ran to the street to help.
The rapist escaped with a start from the headlights of a nearby delivery van, and Hicks said it was then.
But when the cops Marvin Vinson and Dennis Zungolo came in second, they assumed he attacked the woman and shot her.
They later claimed that Hicks had fired at them and shot him in defense.
He was convicted of rape, aggravated assault, possession of criminal instruments, and terrorist threats, and sentenced to 25 years in prison behind bars.
Although the woman was unable to identify her assailant at the trial and suffered a head injury, her conviction came.
Hicks was found eligible for parole in 2015, but was denied as he continued to claim his innocence.
However, after his case was reviewed this week, his conviction was overturned by the Integrity of Conviction Division of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office.
The head of that unit said that ‘false testimony’ would be blamed for it.
“False testimony was used and I believe it is impossible to say that it did not contribute to the conviction,” said CIU president Patricia Cummings.
Among the reasons for the decision were that the police story was not consistent with Hicks’ wounds – he was shot in the back – and there was no reliable security camera to determine exactly what happened.
Hicks’ lawyers also say he never fired on the police.
They claim that the officers did this part of the story and even put a gun at him to justify shooting him.
The gun is registered with another Philadelphia cop who never reported it was missing.
Hicks ‘lawyers prove that they were lying when the blood came from the woman in the gun, but Hicks’ jacket was not on the inside from which the cops said he took it off.
Officers also claimed that, under oath, after Hicks’s arrest, he wore a gray hoodie as the attacker wore, although he was not hooded in between the hoodies.
Hicks was released from prison on Wednesday. It is not clear now whether he will sue the police department.
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, both police are employed by the department.
The police department did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com’s questions as to whether they would lose their jobs or be given leave while an investigation was being conducted by the Police Advisory Commission, which promised to review the case.
Vinson was racially harassed by a taxi driver who said he had accused him of theft in a separate litigation against the police department and told him to ‘return to his country’.
Hicks, released from jail on Wednesday: ‘I’m feeling 100 kilos lighter.
It is unfortunate and sad that it took me so long to clear my name. I’ve been saying the same thing from day one …
Citizens must be given what is promised: a fair trial and a fair view of what is offered. ‘
Vanessa Potkin, lawyer for Hicks, post-conviction director at the Innocence Project, said: ‘Mr. Hicks’s case is another example of the common police liar problem in the criminal justice system.
Covering up shooting an innocent man required the false testimony of three officers and the consent of a dozen more.
‘Well-established police abuse and institutional protections are often the source of false convictions and injustice in the system.
‘Police lied deliberately with impunity for too long; we need accountability. ‘